Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

Sunday, April 26, 2015

445: Early Hard Drives


This 1961-era 1MB hard drive is too small to hold this picture.

This 28MB IBM 1301 machine cost $110,000 and weighed half a ton.



And now you have this to carry around in your pocket.


Go here:
http://www.jcmit.com/flashprice.htm

Can you compose a simple rule about prices over time?

Data copied here:

X Y Year Month Sales Company Manufacturer Size Size Cost
date US$/MB           MBytes US$
2003.17 0.258 2003 25-Mar NewEgg.com Samsung 128MB Flash 128 33
2003.58 0.191 2003 19-Aug NewEgg.com Dana-Elec 256MB Flash 256 49
2003.75 0.219 2003 1-Oct NewEgg.com Delkin 256MB Flash 256 56
2004 0.191 2004 Jan pcclub.com Simpletech 256MB Flash 256 49
2004.17 0.238 2004 16-Mar NewEgg.com SanDisk 256MB Flash 256 61
2004.33 0.266 2004 4-May NewEgg.com SanDisk 256MB Flash 256 68
2004.42 0.223 2004 8-Jun NewEgg.com SanDisk 256MB Flash 256 57
2005.5 0.0762 2005 July Crucial.com Crucial 512MB Flash 512 38.99
2006.33 0.0219 2006 25-May NewEgg.com Transcend 2GB Flash 2048 43.98
2006.67 0.0156 2006 1-Sep NewEgg.com Patriot 4GB Flash 4096 63.99
2006.83 0.0146 2006 25-Nov NewEgg.com PNY 2GB Flash 2048 29.98
2007 0.0122 2007 28-Jan NewEgg.com Wintec 4GB Flash 4096 49.98
2007.17 0.0104 2007 15-Mar NewEgg.com Transcend 8GB Flash 8192 84.98
2007.33 0.0105 2007 7-May NewEgg.com Kingston 2GB Flash 2048 21.58
2007.5 0.00976 2007 9-Jul NewEgg.com R-Data 4GB Flash 4096 39.98
2007.67 0.00805 2007 30-Sep NewEgg.com A-Data 4GB Flash 4096 32.98
2007.75 0.00763 2007 16-Oct NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 16384 124.98
2007.83 0.00732 2007 10-Nov NewEgg.com Corsair 8GB Flash 4096 29.99
2007.92 0.00763 2007 5-Dec NewEgg.com Corsair 16GB Flash 16384 124.99
2008 0.00458 2008 18-Jan NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 16384 74.98
2008.08 0.00463 2008 20-Feb NewEgg.com PQi 4GB Flash 4096 18.98
2008.33 0.00415 2008 18-May NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 16384 67.98
2008.5 0.00354 2008 7-Jul NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 16384 57.98
2008.58 0.00305 2008 21-Aug NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 16384 49.98
2008.67 0.00311 2008 25-Sep NewEgg.com Transcend 16GB Flash 16384 50.98
2008.83 0.00183 2008 14-Nov NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 32768 59.99
2008.92 0.00214 2008 14-Dec NewEgg.com Corsair 32GB Flash 32768 69.99
2009 0.00162 2009 19-Jan NewEgg.com OCZ 16GB Flash 16384 26.49
2009.08 0.00168 2009 14-Feb NewEgg.com HP 8GB Flash 8192 13.75
2009.25 0.00204 2009 3-Apr NewEgg.com Patriot 64GB Flash 65536 133.99
2009.42 0.00214 2009 3-Jun NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 16384 34.99
2009.5 0.00195 2009 2-Jul NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 16384 31.99
2009.58 0.00177 2009 20-Aug NewEgg.com A-Data 32GB Flash 32768 57.99
2009.75 0.00214 2009 7-Oct NewEgg.com Corsair 16GB Flash 16384 34.99
2009.92 0.00226 2009 12-Dec NewEgg.com A-Data 16GB Flash 16384 36.99
2010 0.00244 2010 15-Jan NewEgg.com Corsair 32GB Flash 32768 79.99
2010.08 0.00226 2010 11-Feb NewEgg.com Lexar 16GB Flash 16384 36.99
2010.17 0.00244 2010 10-Mar NewEgg.com HP 8GB Flash 8192 19.99
2010.33 0.00201 2010 9-May NewEgg.com PNY 16GB Flash 16384 32.99
2010.5 0.00193 2010 25-Jul NewEgg.com Kingston 8GB Flash 8192 15.85
2010.58 0.00176 2010 26-Aug NewEgg.com Lexar 16GB Flash 16384 28.85
2010.75 0.00177 2010 7-Oct NewEgg.com Kingston 16GB Flash 16384 28.99
2010.83 0.00146 2010 16-Nov NewEgg.com OCZ 16GB Flash 16384 23.99
2010.92 0.00119 2010 10-Dec NewEgg.com Patriot 32GB Flash 32768 38.99
2011 0.001403 2011 21-Jan NewEgg.com Transcend 16GB Flash 16384 22.99
2011.08 0.001251 2011 12-Feb NewEgg.com Verbatim 32GB Flash 32768 40.98
2011.33 0.001342 2011 6-May NewEgg.com Patriot 16GB Flash 16384 21.99
2011.42 0.001219 2011 22-Jun NewEgg.com Transcend 16GB Flash 16384 19.98
2011.67 0.001007 2011 2-Sep NewEgg.com Team 32GB Flash 32768 32.99
2011.75 0.001037 2011 17-Oct NewEgg.com Verbatim 16GB Flash 16384 16.99
2012 0.000824 2012 12-Jan NewEgg.com Corsair 32GB Flash 32768 26.99
2012.08 0.000824 2012 13-Feb NewEgg.com Team 32GB Flash 32768 26.99
2012.25 0.000793 2012 8-Apr NewEgg.com Team 32GB Flash 32768 25.99
2012.33 0.000702 2012 24-May NewEgg.com HP 32GB Flash 32768 22.99
2012.58 0.00058 2012 20-Aug NewEgg.com Transcend 32GB Flash 32768 18.99
2012.62 0.00061 2012 21-Sep NewEgg.com Kingston 16GB Flash 16384 9.99
2012.83 0.00061 2012 17-Nov NewEgg.com Kingston 16GB Flash 16384 9.99
2013 0.000458 2013 17-Jan NewEgg.com DNY 64GB Flash 65536 26.99
2013.08 0.000518 2013 23-Feb NewEgg.com Lexar 32GB Flash 32768 16.99
2013.33 0.00058 2013 18-May NewEgg.com Transcend 64GB Flash 65536 37.98
2013.42 0.000564 2013 30-Jun NewEgg.com Transcend 64GB Flash 65536 36.98
2013.58 0.000564 2013 9-Aug NewEgg.com Transcend 64GB Flash 65536 36.98
2013.62 0.000564 2013 7-Sep NewEgg.com Transcend 64GB Flash 65536 36.98
2013.75 0.000534 2013 16-Oct NewEgg.com Centon 64GB Flash 65536 34.98
2013.83 0.000542 2013 10-Nov NewEgg.com Centon 128GB Flash 131072 70.98
2013.92 0.000548 2013 23-Dec NewEgg.com AData 16GB Flash 16384 8.98
2014.08 0.000457 2014 8-Feb NewEgg.com Transcend 32GB Flash 32768 14.98
2014.17 0.000473 2014 13-Mar NewEgg.com Team 64GB Flash 65536 30.98
2014.25 0.000366 2014 10-Apr NewEgg.com Silicon Power 32GB Flash 32768 11.99
2014.42 0.000389 2014 19-Jun NewEgg.com PNY 128GB 131072 50.98
2014.58 0.000335 2014 2-Aug NewEgg.com Adata 32GB Flash 32768 10.98
2014.67 0.000345 2014 13-Sep NewEgg.com Silicon Power 64GB Flash 65536 22.58

Saturday, July 19, 2014

191: Walking the Labyrinth

In this labyrinth, there are no false turns or dead ends. You walk the line around the outside, then follow it to the middle. Assume unit distance between lines and ends of turns except for that horizontal entry line. That seems to be half a unit apart from the other lines.

What are some different ways to measure the distance walked?


Sunday, June 15, 2014

155: Pre-Medieval Math, Pyramids part two

Here are the pyramids at Giza, viewed from a satellite. Notice that they are aligned to the north-south lines ... in fact, to within a 0.05 degree. Also measurements of the plateau they sit on have determined that the foundation was carved into the bedrock and the entire site was leveled to within a fraction of an inch.

It's known how the Egyptians managed to perform this feat with the simple tools they had ready and now it's time for you to consider it and try to figure it out..

String, standard measuring sticks carved from granite, a good pair of eyes, that's all. Remember, they were just as smart as you and you are just as smart as they.
  1. How did they align the edge N-S?
  2. How did they level the base so precisely? 
Give up? Look at the alt text of the photo.
To find due north, sight the rising and setting sun and construct the angle bisector. To level the base, cut grooves and partially fill them with water, then cut the sides of the grooves to the water line. Presto.

Was it aliens?


No, that's just crazy talk.


Look at the alt text for the pyramid photo for the explanation.

Here's another ..

Saturday, June 14, 2014

154: Pre-Medieval Math, Pyramids

From Bryn, O.J. 2010. Retracing Khufu’s Great Pyramid, Nordic Journal of Architectural Research vol. 22, no 1/2, 135-144. 

You must enlarge this to see the detail.

Interpret the construction layout, Find the angle of the sides .... heck, you know how this works.

Thursday, June 12, 2014

152: Medieval Geometric Constructions

Ok, you have a straightedge and a compass, and a steel point to scribe with.
Geometrical constructions ....
GO.


Symmetry.


Images are of the Alhambra, of course.

Wednesday, June 11, 2014

151: Medieval Altitude Measurement

Explain the reasoning used in 1588 to find the height of the castle.

So they could shoot it.


Tuesday, June 10, 2014

150: Angle of Elevation in 1588

If that inclinometer says 40° between the cannon's mouth and plumb, what's the angle of elevation?


Monday, June 9, 2014

149: Medieval Ballistics

Tartaglia


Using the angle between line of sight to the projectile and the horizontal, show why the trajectory was considered to be in this shape for many centuries. (Hint: consider that only those viewing from BEHIND could see the projectile. UPDATE: Yes, those in front could see something coming. "I couldn't figure out what it was coming closer and closer ... then it hit me.")



This may be more than you want ... if so, pay no attention to the following instructions.

In Geogebra, graph the parabolic arc. We'll assume for simplicity that the cannonball begins at (0,0) and hits at (1000,0) with max at (500,250). In the input box, place y=x(x-1000)/1000. Place A at (-10,0) and B, a point on the object f(x). Place c(500,0) so we have three points. Create line segments AB and AC. Measure CAB. Drag B along the curve, paying attention to the angle.  What do you see?
How does it change as you move B?

Monday, April 28, 2014

113: The Address

How long would it take everyone in your school to recite it?



272 words (or 269, depending on how you count, and which version you use.)

On November 19th Lincoln traveled to Gettysburg to dedicate the new Union Cemetery

The featured speaker was Edward Everett of Massachusetts, a diplomat, clergyman, and celebrated orator. The president had been invited almost as an afterthought to offer a few appropriate remarks. Everett spoke for not quite two hours.
Then Lincoln rose. The local photographer took his time focusing; presumably the president could be counted on to go on for a while ... but he spoke just 269 words.

He started off by reminding his audience that just 87 years had passed since the founding of the nation and then he went on to embolden the Union cause with some of the most enduring words ever spoken.

Lincoln was heading back to his seat before the photographer could open the shutter.

He felt that he had failed, that it was a poor speech, that people didn't like it. It was so brief, less than two minutes, he felt that he had failed. His friend, Ward Lehman, was sitting next to him on the stand when he sat down and there was just a sprinkling of applause.

He said "Lehman, that speech won't scour." That's what you say about the plow in the prairies when the mud won't come off it."
"The cheek of every American must tingle with shame when he reads the flat, silly, dish watery utterances of the man who has to be pointed out to intelligent foreigners as the president of the united states."  Chicago Sun-Times
"Dear Mister President, I should be glad if I could flatter myself that I came as near to the central idea of the occasion in two hours as you did in two minutes." - Edward Everett
President Lincoln delivered the 272 word Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863 on the battlefield near Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
"Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, on this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives, that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate—we cannot hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they here gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."


Saturday, January 25, 2014

6: Why 360?

Everyone knows that there are 360 degrees in a circle.

We can also take it as a given that people who did math back in the days of Babylon didn't mess around ... they must have had really good reasons for choosing that number.  They were logical and just as smart as we are now, even if we sometimes don't admit that.

How many good reasons can you think of for 360° in a circle?
How many ridiculous reasons can you think of for 360° in a circle?

Should we change to another number for doohickeys in a circle?